Managing Private & Institutional Assets Since 1959

Resources
Strategy Letters
Market Commentary
Corporate Actions
Links

Market Commentary

 

January 2, 2010

 

Given the fireworks and volatility of 2009, it is with some relief we note that most major asset classes edged higher into the new year with little fan fare. What is clear to us is that the extreme bargains that were available in the first quarter of 2009 are not with us today, and we are acting accordingly and more defensively. During any time period, but particularly in the short run, we would re-emphasize our long-term goal – be competitive in rising markets and outperform in challenging to down markets.

It is our well-researched belief that the “Great Pendulum Swing” of the last two years has mostly run its course, and we are now entering into a more normalized world containing the usual litany of economic and political questions, very few of which we pretend to have the answer. As economic historian John Kenneth Galbraith noted, “There are only two types of forecasters, those who don’t know and those who don’t know they don’t know.” If 2009 proved anything, it is that the ability of an investor to reliably pinpoint major market inflection points and act accordingly is extraordinarily limited.

The alternative to reading tea leaves is of course value investing, which we continue to practice and preach at Reed Conner & Birdwell. We have built an eclectic research team of highly motivated portfolio manager/analysts who operate in a entrepreneurially disciplined environment that seeks absolute outperformance through hard work and superior insight within focused portfolios.

Recognizing the folly of elaborate forecasting, we focus our attention on the analysis and valuation of specific securities. When you have done your own work on the intrinsic value of a company, that is the benchmark with which you can compare to the publicly traded price of the stock, and this benchmark helps to keep your wits about you in the swells of popular opinion. In 2009, the key to success was having faith in this rational process and not being afraid to lean into what was obviously a terrifying wind and purchase more of very good businesses at better and better prices.

“The Lost Decade for Equities” seems to occupy a fair amount of press time these days and, in our view, represents possibly the best argument for stock investing today. Besides the old issue of data mining (starting with the highest point in history and throwing in the 2nd worst stock market year in history at the tail end), the time to be worried was exactly ten years ago when stock markets and investor confidence were at all-time highs. We cannot recall a single period in our own investing history during which we have witnessed as much rank cynicism and disregard of a few hundred years of financial and economic history as we are seeing today. To quote our favorite Omaha investor, “Be fearful when others are greedy, and be greedy when others are fearful.” It is crucial to understand just how unusual it is for bonds to outperform stocks over extended periods, and we suggest that given the current level of interest rates, and the simple mathematics of dropping the 1999 market peak from the beginning of new ten year cycles, stocks outperforming bonds is very close to a slam dunk over the next ten years. (P.S. – While not crowing by any means, RCB strategies returned between 4.5% to 8.7% gross annualized for the 10 year period.)

As we noted in our previous commentaries there remains a number of interesting values that can be intelligently purchased today, but we are going to need reasonable economic activity to “move the needle” in the broader equity markets over the next few years. We continue to have a balanced portfolio of offensive and defensive stocks as relates to the correlation between investment success and relative exposure to a resumption of economic growth. Without tiptoeing into forecasting, we note that there likely is some symmetry between the possibility of good versus bad economic news on the horizon, yet much of Washington D.C. and the financial press seem to only allow for the possibility of Black Swans vs. White Swans. In both ponds and in the economic history of the United States, white swans are actually the rule, not the exception. Cycles are a fact of life and need not be feared, but be priced accordingly.

 

Disclosure: The opinions expressed herein are those of Reed Conner & Birdwell are subject to change without notice. Past performance is not a guarantee or indicator of future results. You should not consider the information in this commentary a recommendation to buy or sell any particular security. These securities may not be in your account by the time you receive this report, or may have been repurchased for your account. These securities do not represent your entire account and may represent only a small percentage of your account. You should not assume that any of the securities discussed in this report are or will be profitable, or that recommendations we make in the future will be profitable or equal the performance.

Market Commentary, October 1, 2009

Market Commentary, July 1, 2009

Market Commentary, April 2, 2009

Market Commentary, October 1, 2008

Market Commentary, July 1, 2008

Market Commentary, April 1, 2008

Market Commentary, October 1, 2007

Market Commentary, July 2, 2007

Market Commentary, April 2, 2007

Market Commentary, October 2, 2006

Market Commentary, January 3, 2006

Home | About Us | Approach to Investing | Investment Products | Resources | Advisor Access | Contact Us | Site Map
© 2003 Reed Conner & Birdwell, LLC. All rights reserved. | Privacy Policy